Dear Mr. Obama,

Dear Mr. Obama,

Please let me give you one piece of advice– when you ride a bike, make sure your seat is high enough. It is obvious in this picture that your seat is not high enough.Your seat height should be high enough that it allows full leg extension, with a slight bend in the leg at the bottom of the pedal stroke.

If you move your seat higher you will ride much more comfortably. Then again, if insist on riding a bike while riding jeans, I really can’t help you on the comfort front.

Your bike riding pal,

Daniel

P.S. The next time you are tempted to throw your Grandmother under the bus to protect a racist loser like Jeremiah Wright, think twice. Comparing your Grandma to losers like Wright is always a bad idea, as Wright proved no long after you displayed your lack of love for your Grandma.

The Fallacy of Green Collar Jobs

This post does a good job of explaining the fallacy of “green collar” jobs. Obama, Hillary, and McCain argue that if we increase regulation and make energy more expensive, it will magically create new jobs making  clean energy and we wil come out ahead economically. This is silly and is another example of the “broken windows fallacy.”

French economist Fredric Bastiat told the story of how breaking windows may seem to create jobs, but such activity is actually wasteful. Bastiat explained that the most important thing was what was not seen, not merely seeing a glass repairman fix the window.

The story goes like this, someone breaks a window. The broken window gives a glass repairman more work, which in turn helps the glass repairman’s supplier because the supplier gets to sell another pane of glass. If one just looks at this part of the transaction, it seems like it would be economically beneficial to break a bunch of windows.

To anyone other than Obama, Hillary, McCain, and the promoters of “green collar jobs,” it is easy to see the flaw in the broken windows story–what matters is not just what is seen (the improved workload for the window repairman), but what the window repairman could have been doing if he didn’t have to spend his time fixing senselessly broken windows, as well as the things the owner of the window could have spent his money on if he didn’t have to repair the window.  This is a simple concept, but too many people don’t get it.

Here’s more from the post I linked to in the intro:

Has there ever been a more timely natural catastrophe than climate change? I mean, here we all are worrying about the future of the American economy—too much debt, jobs and industries moving overseas, new competitors in Asia and India—when what merrily comes along is a perceived civilizational challenge whose solution will not only create a better environment but also—talk about luck!—millions of those high-paying “green-collar” jobs and innovative new industries of the future that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have been talking about. As Clinton said in one presidential debate, “This issue of energy and global warming has the promise of creating millions of new jobs in America. It can be a win-win, if we do it right.”

Heck, if climate change was a sham, it almost seems that it would be worthwhile to fabricate it, given all the apparent economic benefits. Then again, maybe not. Here is what William Pizer, an economist at Resources for the Future and a lead author on the most recent report from the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said at a symposium earlier this week here in Washington: “As an economist, I am skeptical that [dealing with climate change] is going to make money. You’ll have new industries, but they’ll be doing what old industries did but a higher net cost…. You’ll be depleting other industries.”

Obama is not an idiot.

Mickey Kaus on Obama and Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick:

Jon Keller revisits Obama wrang-wrang Deval Patrick–the pioneering African-American governor of Massachusetts who now has a 56% disapproval rating. What’s the difference between Obama and Patrick? They were both relatively inexperienced. They were both advised by David Axelrod. They both ran on race-transcending “hope.” A veteran GOP political analyst recently described to me what he considered the key analytic distinction:

Deval Patrick is an idiot. Obama is not an idiot.

Obama Won’t Beat McCain

I don’t think Obama or Hillary will beat John McCain. I’m not a fan of many of McCain’s positions, but I think he’ll be the next President. Here’s one reason why, according to the latest CBS News/NY Times poll “McCain now holds a three-point lead over Obama among women; last month, women gave Obama a 13-point margin.”

It’s a long time until November and everything can change, but things are trending poorly for Obama as the attacks continue.

Why Didn’t Obama Write “Dreams From My Mother”

Ann Althouse isn’t in love with Obama’s book Dreams From My Mother:

And let me add that I found “Dreams From My Father” a perplexing read. For me, the most moving part is the introduction to the new edition, in which he says that he really ought to have written about his mother — as if her “dreams” have more to do with what he is. Certainly, they should. He lived with her (and her parents), and the father abandoned him. Why does his book consign her to the background? His narrative is based on the idea that that his absent father represents his true identity, and I had the sense that, for some reason, he decided that the story of embracing his patrilineal racial identity would make the best narrative. After all, he sold the book proposal based on the excitement created by his distinction as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review. The story he tells culminates with a trip to Africa as an adult to meet the many relatives who had nothing to do with his upbringing. This he presents as the ultimate homecoming. From a feminist perspective, this troubled me. Had the introduction not reassured me that he knew he owed so much more to his mother, I would have felt downright angry.

Obama’s Description of His Grandmother Turns Me Off

I recently read Obama’s recent speech on race and it further turned me off to his candidacy. Overall, it was a good speech. Obama is truly a gifted orator. I agree with a lot of it, but his depiction of his grandmother in the speech was completely off-putting and offensive. Here’s what Obama said about this grandmother in the speech:

I can no more disown him [Rev. Wright] than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.

According to the Barack Obama in 2008, his grandmother “once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street.” But that’s not how the the Obama in 1995 apparently described the same incident. In Dreams from My Father a teenage Obama woke up to an argument between grandparents. At the time, he was being raised by his white grandparents. While going to work his grandmother had been accosted by a black man while she waited for the bus. Obama writes:

“Her lips pursed with irritation. ‘He was very aggressive, Barry. Very aggressive. I gave him a dollar and he kept asking. If the bus hadn’t come, I think he might have hit me over the head.”

“He turned around and I saw that he was shaking. ‘It is a big deal. It’s a big deal to me. She’s been bothered by men before. You know why she’s so scared this time. I’ll tell you why. Before you came in, she told me the fella was black.‘ He whispered the word. ‘That’s the real reason why she’s bothered. And I just don’t think that right.’

“The words were like a fist in my stomach, and I wobbled to regain my composure. In my steadiest voice, I told him that such an attitude bothered me, too, but reassured him that Toot’s fears would pass and that we should give her a ride in the meantime. Gramps slumped into a chair in the living room and said he was sorry he had told me. Before my eyes, he grew small and old and very sad. I put my hand on his shoulder and told him that it was all right, I understood.

“We remained like that for several minutes, in painful silence. Finally he insisted that he drive Toot after all, and I thought about my grandparents. They had sacrificed again and again for me. They had poured all their lingering hopes into my success. Never had they given me reason to doubt their love; I doubted if they ever would. And yet I knew that men who might easily have been my brothers could still inspire their rawest fear.” [page 88-91]

Maybe the 2008 Barack Obama is talking about something different entirely, I don’t know. But it sounds like the same. If it is the same incident, Obama has little respect for his grandmother. In the 1995 version, his Grandmother was accosted by a bum. In the 2008 version, she had a general fear of blacks. If she had been accosted, it is understandable why she would be afraid of blacks.

I don’t think highly of people who disrespect their grandmother or mothers and compare them to the likes of Rev. Wright. Especially when, like Obama, they are doing it for political gain.

I could be wrong, so please comment if you disagree with my take on this situation. Even before I knew about Obama’s description of the event in his book, comparing his grandma to Rev. Wright didn’t sit well with me.

Here’s where I got the quotes from Obama’s book.

Obama’s agenda is “completely ordinary, highly partisan, not candid and mostly unresponsive…”

Robert Samuelson isn’t exactly impressed with Obama’s actual policy prescriptions:

It’s hard not to be dazzled by Barack Obama. At the 2004 Democratic convention, he visited with Newsweek reporters and editors, including me. I came away deeply impressed by his intelligence, his forceful language and his apparent willingness to take positions that seemed to rise above narrow partisanship. Obama has become the Democratic presidential front-runner precisely because countless millions have formed a similar opinion. It is, I now think, mistaken.

As a journalist, I harbor serious doubt about each of the most likely nominees. But with Sens. Hillary Clinton and John McCain, I feel that I’m dealing with known quantities. They’ve been in the public arena for years; their views, values and temperaments have received enormous scrutiny. By contrast, newcomer Obama is largely a stage presence defined mostly by his powerful rhetoric. The trouble, at least for me, is the huge and deceptive gap between his captivating oratory and his actual views.

Repudiating racism is not a magic cure-all for the nation’s ills. The task requires independent ideas, and Obama has few. If you examine his agenda, it is completely ordinary, highly partisan, not candid and mostly unresponsive to many pressing national problems.

Political candidates routinely indulge in exaggeration, pandering, inconsistency and self-serving obscuration. Clinton and McCain do. The reason for holding Obama to a higher standard is that it’s his standard and also his campaign’s central theme. He has run on the vague promise of “change,” but on issue after issue — immigration, the economy, global warming — he has offered boilerplate policies that evade the underlying causes of the stalemates. These issues remain contentious because they involve real conflicts or differences of opinion.

The contrast between his broad rhetoric and his narrow agenda is stark, and yet the media — preoccupied with the political “horse race” — have treated his invocation of “change” as a serious idea rather than a shallow campaign slogan. He seems to have hypnotized much of the media and the public with his eloquence and the symbolism of his life story. The result is a mass delusion that Obama is forthrightly engaging the nation’s major problems when, so far, he isn’t.